I can at least understand the troons who figured out they can bully lesbians into sex, it's depraved but I can understand the rationale. However I don't understand why any man who likes dicks would, well, dick around with the troon stuff.
It's because they are not gay. They are not men attracted to masculinity. They are men, attracted to their own femininity.
They don't want to have sex with men.
They do want to become women, and they want that because it makes them feel better about themselves.
For the gays who are topping troons, the situation, I argue, is even worse:
They are men who are attracted to femininity, but are so low-value they are choosing to having sex with effeminate men. Meaning they aren't even high value gay men. But if being gay is about being attracted to masculinity as a man; and by definition, being straight is about being attracted to femininity as a man; then it means that a man attracted to a man impersonating a feminine woman isn't a gay man: it's a broken straight guy.
I think this equation actually explains why the LGBTQ2SIA+ community has risen in numbers so high as of recently. Not only is it social rather than biological, a large number of these "gay" men are actually low-value straight men.
I think it is that deep, and it shows a problem of fetishization normalization and incentivization in cultural institutions that children occupy, and a slew of failed parents.
Wait until he realizes that straight men aren't lining up to fuck him like in the sissy porn movies he's addicted to.
Say it with me kids: It's a fetish.
Why can't they just be fags?
I can at least understand the troons who figured out they can bully lesbians into sex, it's depraved but I can understand the rationale. However I don't understand why any man who likes dicks would, well, dick around with the troon stuff.
It's because they are not gay. They are not men attracted to masculinity. They are men, attracted to their own femininity.
They don't want to have sex with men.
They do want to become women, and they want that because it makes them feel better about themselves.
For the gays who are topping troons, the situation, I argue, is even worse:
They are men who are attracted to femininity, but are so low-value they are choosing to having sex with effeminate men. Meaning they aren't even high value gay men. But if being gay is about being attracted to masculinity as a man; and by definition, being straight is about being attracted to femininity as a man; then it means that a man attracted to a man impersonating a feminine woman isn't a gay man: it's a broken straight guy.
I think this equation actually explains why the LGBTQ2SIA+ community has risen in numbers so high as of recently. Not only is it social rather than biological, a large number of these "gay" men are actually low-value straight men.
It’s not even that deep.
These people are delusional and sick, most often from repeated sexual abuse.
Go back to throwing them into asylums where they belong
I think it is that deep, and it shows a problem of fetishization normalization and incentivization in cultural institutions that children occupy, and a slew of failed parents.