If I had to guess, it’s because leftists have been substituting “stakeholder” instead of “shareholder” for at least the past decade as part of their corporate subversion.

e.g. instead of having a fiduciary duty to its shareholders to produce good movies that people like and that make money, leftist theory—embraced, it would seem, by the company itself—holds that Disney has a much more nebulous social duty to “stakeholders,” which could be anyone who might be perceived as being affected by their media in any way, to effect social change. Which leads to the kind of stuff Disney is making instead of good movies.