In principle, it sounds good to make women bear the same responsibilities that men have for the power to vote, but in practice I think integrating women into the armed forces will actually decrease their effectiveness and get more men killed.
(Also, if we’re being realistic, while giving women the vote probably has some bearing on how we got to this point, at this point, I’m not convinced that the votes of men or women have any real impact on what wars we will fight).
No. That is the slippery slope that let them into "leadership" roles. I have seen admin go female, then everything go feminist in the workplace. Secretaries, and all other roles, have to be male. Except for prostitutes and wives. Which, in the military at least, are the same thing.
In principle, it sounds good to make women bear the same responsibilities that men have for the power to vote, but in practice I think integrating women into the armed forces will actually decrease their effectiveness and get more men killed.
(Also, if we’re being realistic, while giving women the vote probably has some bearing on how we got to this point, at this point, I’m not convinced that the votes of men or women have any real impact on what wars we will fight).
The army needs secretaries though.
No. That is the slippery slope that let them into "leadership" roles. I have seen admin go female, then everything go feminist in the workplace. Secretaries, and all other roles, have to be male. Except for prostitutes and wives. Which, in the military at least, are the same thing.