Security modeling is more complicated for organizations at that scale. Gotta assess the importance and sensitivity of various trade secrets, and compartmentalize accordingly. Being too secretive can compromise product quality, or the effectiveness of said secrecy policies themselves. "Wages of secrecy" is the term I'm aware of, from ESR's writings on open source software.
At Twitter, any such blanket policy would be absolute overkill, and result in a brain-drain and stiffening of corporate culture. Spacex and Tesla have more pervasive trade secrets, for the right experts to preform cost/risk analysis.
An OpenAI (or any similar cloud product) ban
is what any competent corporation should be doing. For appropriate opsec, a company has to have a general culture of literacy, merit, loyalty, and independent thinking, best summed by the saying "common sense is not so common".
Security modeling is more complicated for organizations at that scale. Gotta assess the importance and sensitivity of various trade secrets, and compartmentalize accordingly. Being too secretive can compromise product quality, or the effectiveness of said secrecy policies themselves. "Wages of secrecy" is the term I'm aware of, from ESR's writings on open source software.
At Twitter, any such blanket policy would be absolute overkill, and result in a brain-drain and stiffening of corporate culture. Spacex and Tesla have more pervasive trade secrets, for the right experts to preform cost/risk analysis.
An OpenAI (or any similar cloud product) ban is what any competent corporation should be doing. For appropriate opsec, a company has to have a general culture of literacy, merit, loyalty, and independent thinking, best summed by the saying "common sense is not so common".
That's all part of network design.