Let's not forget that the end of the day, even "good" judges have names and addresses, and because of anarcho-tyranny, they're at the mercy of whatever mob of proglodyte mouthbreathers is whipped up by the MSM.

We saw journoroaches drive after the jury van during the Chauvin trial and a verdict that somehow found Chauvin guilty of both manslaughter and murder just because the jurors didn't want Minneapolis to burn (again). We saw Matthew Dolloff get his charges dropped after murdering a Trump voter on camera. Nevermind all the 2020 bullshit that wasn't even allowed to be investigated because judges were terrified of becoming lightning rods for so much as entertaining the claims of fraud.

Rittenhouse was a remarkable situation precisely because the jurors chose to do the right thing in spite of the intimidation and the threat of rioting if they didn't get the verdict they wanted, as well as a courageous judge who refused to let that crooked piece of shit DA get away with his dirty tricks. But unfortunately that's not the norm, for the most part juror and judge and witness intimidation works in practice, even though it's not supposed to work in theory.

Although I will admit killing Roe and a big part of affirmative action were moves I didn't expect SCOTUS to make after their cowardice in the face of 2020. Then again maybe it's just not as easy to whip up riots when there's a Dem in the White House. Not that it doesn't happen under Dems, it certainly does, but you have to rely more on the activist/ideologue core rather than on the reserve force of proglodyte retards whose brains operate on nothing more sophisticated than "Republicans Bad."