The link has been deleted in the screenshot so as not to give clicks to this oddball. https://i.imgur.com/j6vF3Gd.png
This is what he declared "This is the thing right, and I'm not at all coming at you specifically, but clearly, the game is reviewing well. I wanted to ensure in my review to dock significant points for the objectifying BS specifically because I knew the industry at large, even if they do mention it as a negative element in their review, would still let it slip by with 8/10's. What lessons do we expect developers to learn if they're not held to account for this stuff? How else do we hold them to account beyond not buying the game I suppose." https://i.imgur.com/WMLwLOP.png
He is overestemating his importance. Metacritic has completely ignored his review.
"Metacritic has completely ignored his review." I'm not understanding something, did Metacritic specifically discount his review or is he not even notable enough to have a review counted anyway?
His website is not relevant enough.
Gotcha, thanks