Oversimplification amd romanticization of the samurai class. The Edo period under Tokugawa was hundreds of years of relative peace after the unification, and the restoration of the empire in the meiji period saw the abolishment of the samurai class in the 19th century. Prior to Edo, they had a very brutal warring states era that devastated their country. The samurai were not the whole of japanese culture in that era, they were the tools of the feudal lords and were feared by the general populace.
Not sure how its "romanticizing " to say the facts that the military class ruled for nearly a thousand years. i didn't say that their leadership was necessarily good(though i do think being ruled by a military class is better than being ruled by merchants and bankers like today) but i do say that Japan was a militaristic country for a large junk of their history and them completely rejecting this is completely backwards and rejecting a large junk of what their heritage is
Oversimplification amd romanticization of the samurai class. The Edo period under Tokugawa was hundreds of years of relative peace after the unification, and the restoration of the empire in the meiji period saw the abolishment of the samurai class in the 19th century. Prior to Edo, they had a very brutal warring states era that devastated their country. The samurai were not the whole of japanese culture in that era, they were the tools of the feudal lords and were feared by the general populace.
Not sure how its "romanticizing " to say the facts that the military class ruled for nearly a thousand years. i didn't say that their leadership was necessarily good(though i do think being ruled by a military class is better than being ruled by merchants and bankers like today) but i do say that Japan was a militaristic country for a large junk of their history and them completely rejecting this is completely backwards and rejecting a large junk of what their heritage is