Basically the title. Old game but I finally got it on sale, I don't care about fighting for the invading brown people, especially when I'm roleplaying as a Rennaisance-era Christian European. What were they thinking.
AC1: I'm an Arab ninja taking out Crusaders currently invading my homeland. Great.
AC2: I'm a rennaisance Italian ninja in a blood feud against another family of rennaisance Italians. Perfect.
AC2B: I'm the same Italian ninja liberating Rome from the the invading corrupt Italians. This makes sense.
AC2R: I'm the same Italian and I'm siding with the Turks in crushing the remenants of Constantinople. What. The OBVIOUS choice was liberating Constantinople from invading corrupt Ottomans. Byzantines who, wait for it, would have called themselves ROMANS at the time. This was so obvious, what were they smoking.
EDIT: Everything else was great though. I enjoyed the cutscenes and the Altair-Ezio-Desmond finale. But the gameplay story (ie most of the fucking game) was ass.
You realize that the assassins in AC are basically freemason Jews, right? All of those stories are extremely anti-christian.
AC revelations is the game that made me realize the assassin’s are the bad guy. Oh and in the DLC they make Vlad the Impaler a Templar. Vlad is a national hero to Romanians because he freed us from being subjugated by the Muslim Turks. So if Vlad was a Templar then the Templars aren’t the bad guy in this story.
Exactly. They frame the pious people as evil masons while you assassinate them as "one of the good guys".