the perpetrators of child sexual abuse, more broadly, are a variety of ethnicities
Which I did not think was in debate, particularly.
And in any event, the major problem is this: Other child rapists get arrested, get charged, get tried and get jailed.
Child rapists of certain ethnicities have their victims arrested for "child prostitution", which isn't even an offence in the UK, or their victim's families arrested, when they try to intervene.
Why would any rational actor stop when the state is going out of it's way to facilitate this barbarism?
The basis for this appears to be:
Which I did not think was in debate, particularly.
And in any event, the major problem is this: Other child rapists get arrested, get charged, get tried and get jailed.
Child rapists of certain ethnicities have their victims arrested for "child prostitution", which isn't even an offence in the UK, or their victim's families arrested, when they try to intervene.
Why would any rational actor stop when the state is going out of it's way to facilitate this barbarism?