She also argued the lower court adopted "a novel and disruptive conception of the state-action doctrine" that allegedly runs afoul of the First Amendment
The first amendment protects the people from government censorship, not the right of the government to censor the people.
The first amendment protects the people from government censorship, not the right of the government to censor the people.
Ahh, but who will protect the rights of government agents to speak freely about censoring the US populace with the relevant contractors?
Will no-one think of the poor Stasi agents?