I mean, I get why. Your laser printer does not "own" copyright on the Picasso you just had it print.
Now, if Hollywood were to show that the use of the AI tool is subject to copyright - the techniques for modifying the prompt to deliver an appropriate response, or, if they get clever, conscious curation of the AI's base data set or something - they might have more room for argument here, no?
I mean, I get why. Your laser printer does not "own" copyright on the Picasso you just had it print.
Now, if Hollywood were to show that the use of the AI tool is subject to copyright - the techniques for modifying the prompt to deliver an appropriate response, or, if they get clever, conscious curation of the AI's base data set or something - they might have more room for argument here, no?