Pfizer Confirms Via FOIA Graphene Oxide in the Clot Shots
(en-volve.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
This is absolute bullshit. The document in question refers to a protocol to perform electron microscopy on a sample of the purified spike protein (expressed according to the sequence in these injections). It is NOT the protocol to manufacture these injections. Seriously, people should learn how to read and interpret the information they are reading, rather than jumping to stupid conclusions because they are too dumb or lazy or understand what they are reading.
Why wouldn't Pfizer just publicly share this instead of denying its use if it is so innocuous?
There's plenty of information in those documents that's not "innocuous", such as the damning information about the LNP distribution following injection in animal models, but this electron microscopy protocol is red herring. In my opinion, the whole graphene oxide "conspiracy" is a fake story spread to discredit those opposed to these injections.
They better retract these papers then:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26814441/
Oh! You found references to graphene oxide as a potential ingredient in vaccines in the scientific literature! Therefore, obviously all vaccines must have graphene oxide in them! What a stupid argument. It's a red herring.
The expression of the spike protein is toxic enough by itself (and maybe the LNPs themselves), without needing to invoke some other toxic components, yet alone the ludicrous graphene oxide "nanobot" hypothesis (as if humans have technology that advanced).