But I thought they were feminists? How does their race matter? Unless you're a leftist now too and have some white supremacy spin to surprise us all with?
If white women ruled over society then surely white men would have some preferential treatment while the rest of you would be getting lined up for the male genocide, instead of being the #1 blame for the patriarchy, considering they'd still need white men to ensure they remain white to rule over society?
I just used the paper's own conclusions for the title. You're overthinking it.
Did you even read it? It speaks clearly about the feminist "elite" being all white.
Also, the fact that you jumped so quickly to defend white women is why I call you people stormcucks. They wouldn't give you a drop of water in the desert if they had their own river.
The paper drew the conclusion which you seemed to agree with yourself.
Talk about calling someone a cuck when you delete the thread, what, you suddenly changed your mind? And I wasn't defending white women here, I simply asked why does it matter that they are white women when I thought feminists ruled society, and feminists don't really seem to have racial initiatives.
Examples of exclusive female privileges include domestic violence services, emergency accommodation, elite female-only gym and exercise clubs, legal services, and so on. Moreover, some legal actions have led, often inadvertently, to women's groups being ordered to open their services to not only trans women, but also to men and boys –with the threat of de-funding or further lawsuits for failure to comply with the spirit of anti-discrimination legislation.
What women actually fear is not the girldick, but the possibility of their unearned pedestal being ripped down on a technicality.
But I thought they were feminists? How does their race matter? Unless you're a leftist now too and have some white supremacy spin to surprise us all with?
If white women ruled over society then surely white men would have some preferential treatment while the rest of you would be getting lined up for the male genocide, instead of being the #1 blame for the patriarchy, considering they'd still need white men to ensure they remain white to rule over society?
I just used the paper's own conclusions for the title. You're overthinking it.
Did you even read it? It speaks clearly about the feminist "elite" being all white.
Also, the fact that you jumped so quickly to defend white women is why I call you people stormcucks. They wouldn't give you a drop of water in the desert if they had their own river.
The paper drew the conclusion which you seemed to agree with yourself.
Talk about calling someone a cuck when you delete the thread, what, you suddenly changed your mind? And I wasn't defending white women here, I simply asked why does it matter that they are white women when I thought feminists ruled society, and feminists don't really seem to have racial initiatives.
I deleted the thread to get back under five posts in 24 hours.
What women actually fear is not the girldick, but the possibility of their unearned pedestal being ripped down on a technicality.