There are pros and cons to married priests. The Roman church (most of Catholicism) only holds priestly celibacy to be discipline and can change it. One of the largest cons to priestly celibacy is the hiding of gays in the priesthood, as you mentioned. But between the vocations crisis generally, and the amount of divided priorities a married priest has (family vs parish, marital relations vs Divine Liturgy, availability), I don't think it's wise for Rome to change its discipline. An increase of clerical Brothers and Deacons would definitely help offset the day-to-day minutiae and allow the priest to focus on holiness but we're far from that point. The key here would not be to admit so many gays to seminary but since the hierarchy of the Church is already compromised, it's not going to happen (and reform won't follow) for a few generations.
There are pros and cons to married priests. The Roman church (most of Catholicism) only holds priestly celibacy to be discipline and can change it. One of the largest cons to priestly celibacy is the hiding of gays in the priesthood, as you mentioned. But between the vocations crisis generally, and the amount of divided priorities a married priest has (family vs parish, marital relations vs Divine Liturgy, availability), I don't think it's wise for Rome to change its discipline. An increase of clerical Brothers and Deacons would definitely help offset the day-to-day minutiae and allow the priest to focus on holiness but we're far from that point. The key here would not be to admit so many gays to seminary but since the hierarchy of the Church is already compromised, it's not going to happen (and reform won't follow) for a few generations.