This guy hit the nail on the head in regards to this whole AI art kerfuffle.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
Yet another person fails to unearth the intellectual property foundations of the matter. If this stuff can't get normies to think about IP as a concept, I don't think anything will.
Hell, no one even wants to address the floorboads of "what is art".
This stuff is so superficial it's becoming intellectually insulting.
Banana taped to a wall, jar of urine containing a crucifix, Basquiat's name spraypainted onto a door, the collected works of Jackson Pollack, everything Banksy's done, ALL OF THAT is considered art in good standing. Somehow AI is a bridge too far. I wonder if it's because it threatens the money laundering scheme with collapse.
A smart artist would make his own AI, train it in his style, and then use it to fill commissions.
I hate all the shit you listed and still think AI Art is creepy. But I think AI is creepy period. And it will do to art what already happened to music, and movies, and TV shows. Honestly it's probably what wrote the latest LOTR series and Black Panther 2. Everything is so fake these days, including food and grass.