You also then would have to acknowledge the other side of risktaking- women take fewer risks, so in addition to fewer big failures, they get fewer big successes. Which means that, for example, in addition to men making up almost all prisoners being fine, men making up almost all CEOs would also be fine. But the paradigm right now is that any time women are ahead is explained by women being better than men, and any time men are ahead is because of misogyny. The result is that all the areas where women are doing worse due to their own decisions are resulting in massive programs to take resources from men and give it to these exact women making these bad decisions. Or, in some cases, not even bad decisions, just different ones- dropping out of the work force to raise a child isn't a bad decision, but refusing to acknowledge that it will affect your lifetime earnings (wage gap) and discriminating against men until it doesn't is unacceptable.

If the left is so hell bent on pretending there are no behavioral differences between men and women that might explain why men are ahead in a few remaining fields, they should absolutely be held to the same standard when it comes to all the areas women are ahead, like the ones mentioned in the article. Saying men being behind is okay in some places expecting them to then also admit that it's okay for women to be behind in other places is never going to work, because they'll never do that, it will just result in the current status quo: The right thinks it's okay for men to be behind, but the left absolutely does not think it's okay for women to be behind, and both sides behave accordingly, resulting in massive, mostly unopposed, discrimination against men.