The Supreme Court unanimously struck down New York's "Son of Sam" law which made it illegal for the actual murderers to receive compensation from writing about their crime.
Silly rabbit, following USSC decisions is for chumps.
Bruenspecifically warned against New York expanding their off limits zones for carrying concealed right in the written decision, but what did the NY state legislature do immediately after the decision was released?
Make everywhere one would want to carry off limits, in direct contravention of Bruen.
What is stomping all over the 1st Amendment when they take such glee in stomping all over the 2nd?
Only the Supreme Court pays any attention to the Second. Most courts pay attention to the First; the Son of Sam law was ruled unconstitutional at every level.
Another of those instances where I feel sure there was a Supreme Court case that went to the point.
Ah, yes, here it is, and it's even a New York case
Simon and Schuster, Inc. v. Members of New York State Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991)
The Supreme Court unanimously struck down New York's "Son of Sam" law which made it illegal for the actual murderers to receive compensation from writing about their crime.
Silly rabbit, following USSC decisions is for chumps.
Bruen specifically warned against New York expanding their off limits zones for carrying concealed right in the written decision, but what did the NY state legislature do immediately after the decision was released?
Make everywhere one would want to carry off limits, in direct contravention of Bruen.
What is stomping all over the 1st Amendment when they take such glee in stomping all over the 2nd?
Only the Supreme Court pays any attention to the Second. Most courts pay attention to the First; the Son of Sam law was ruled unconstitutional at every level.