Example: "[Russel Brand] was The Chosen One! He was supposed to destroy the wealth inequality gap, not join them!!!" -Source
There's no engaging with simple-minded Rhesus Macaques that refuse to think beyond 'Democrats: for the people
Republicans: for the rich' (or whatever the Fox News reverse is).
Einstein and Hawking get credit for distilling the essence theoretical physics to a level where an interested layman can comprehend it, but they didn't bother debating relativity with flat-earthers. It's remarkable how long modern civilization has clung on giving political authority to the snobbish masses with the delusion of modern democracy. The only route to prosperity is by respecting this quadrant graph; by restricting people making irrational decisions for others.
Sure, many people are helpless if earnest, or afraid to step out of line, but just as many gleefully adopt primitive personalities (i.e. what leads to the doublethink I quoted).
It's semantics, but I utterly refuse to call anyone that doesn't have a full belief in the first and second amendments liberals. I do use 'shitlib' because that's fewer syllables than 'regressive leftist'. It's alright if you object to enlightenment era liberalism and it's unforeseen consequences, but the casual Republican calling Democratic-progressives 'liberals' is committing a tactical mistake (in the tribal affiliation, culture-war sense).
Divide and conquer tactics that lead to the marginalization of groups like Golden Dawn is something I intend to write a high-effort essay on, but my summary is this: class-solidarity is axiomatically bullshit, if at least not evil like identity politics. My plain example; the working-class faring better after the black death culled Europe's peasant population. Another reason why compromising with socialists of any brand isn't worthwhile. There is no unity with those of the same SES with those that fall for DaC tactics, such as the genuinely woke, for they are liabilities towards peaceful, productive coexistence.