I just find it amazing. Back in the 80s, when my mind was first questioning and understanding concepts like time, I read up on the beginning of what we know as the Universe. There were two main theories at the time, one was a quiet method with a lightning streak in the diagram. And the other was BBT. Both were theories, both were stated to be just pure conjecture because no evidence existed enough to support or prove they could have happened. There was more than mention in the article that there were plenty of other theories.
Sometime by the late 90s, however, it became holy doctrine that BBT was the One True Origin and anything else was heresy. All science articles, all websites, spoke as if it was settled law and everything was to flesh out this crackpot theory. To support it, they came up with multiple universes, that it all began and ended again and again, that these blasts and collapses were inevitable.
And yet, there has been no proof. Sure, they interpret things like red shift to somehow be proof, but that's just a natural state of light. It doesn't mean the universe is expanding and cooling.
Any evidence that the universe is infinite and always has been, well, that's burning at the stake voodoo witchcraft talk.
Sure, they interpret things like red shift to somehow be proof, but that's just a natural state of light. It doesn't mean the universe is expanding and cooling.
Big Astronomy is hiding the truth: Light just do that.
Red shift is that the further away a light source is, the less colors we can define. Red is the last bit of light we can see from a great distance. So, the further away, the greater amount of red is visible until only red is visible.
They used this as evidence that: what is visible is decaying, thus, getting colder and further away, so everything is spreading out from a central location and dying off since the big bang. The furthest they can see limits the age of the universe based upon the distance vs speed it takes to have gotten there.
What we are learning: red shift just means shit is beyond our visible spectrum until new technology comes along and we can actually see what's out there beyond the old limits. And, what do you know, it's just more of the same fucking shit, not decayed galaxies and fading stars.
Red shifting it the light waves being stretched out my the motion of the source relative to the receiver. Red light has longer waves so the light moves towards the red end of the spectrum... It's not literally red and the colour has nothing to do with how far it goes.
Okay, I got the how of it, wrong, but the components right. And, it does have a visual component. Light going away from you is red shifted, coming towards you is blue shifted.
They use red shifting as an explanation for their BBT, but it doesn't actually support it. It merely explains how they can determine distance and direction.
I just find it amazing. Back in the 80s, when my mind was first questioning and understanding concepts like time, I read up on the beginning of what we know as the Universe. There were two main theories at the time, one was a quiet method with a lightning streak in the diagram. And the other was BBT. Both were theories, both were stated to be just pure conjecture because no evidence existed enough to support or prove they could have happened. There was more than mention in the article that there were plenty of other theories.
Sometime by the late 90s, however, it became holy doctrine that BBT was the One True Origin and anything else was heresy. All science articles, all websites, spoke as if it was settled law and everything was to flesh out this crackpot theory. To support it, they came up with multiple universes, that it all began and ended again and again, that these blasts and collapses were inevitable.
And yet, there has been no proof. Sure, they interpret things like red shift to somehow be proof, but that's just a natural state of light. It doesn't mean the universe is expanding and cooling.
Any evidence that the universe is infinite and always has been, well, that's burning at the stake voodoo witchcraft talk.
Big Astronomy is hiding the truth: Light just do that.
Red shift is that the further away a light source is, the less colors we can define. Red is the last bit of light we can see from a great distance. So, the further away, the greater amount of red is visible until only red is visible.
They used this as evidence that: what is visible is decaying, thus, getting colder and further away, so everything is spreading out from a central location and dying off since the big bang. The furthest they can see limits the age of the universe based upon the distance vs speed it takes to have gotten there.
What we are learning: red shift just means shit is beyond our visible spectrum until new technology comes along and we can actually see what's out there beyond the old limits. And, what do you know, it's just more of the same fucking shit, not decayed galaxies and fading stars.
Red shifting it the light waves being stretched out my the motion of the source relative to the receiver. Red light has longer waves so the light moves towards the red end of the spectrum... It's not literally red and the colour has nothing to do with how far it goes.
Okay, I got the how of it, wrong, but the components right. And, it does have a visual component. Light going away from you is red shifted, coming towards you is blue shifted.
https://earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/what-is-a-redshift/
They use red shifting as an explanation for their BBT, but it doesn't actually support it. It merely explains how they can determine distance and direction.