https://archive.ph/WNI0K - The original for the obligatory "disadvantaged poor person seeking wealth redistribution and rich person files insurance claim, net happiness increases" commentary.
https://archive.ph/Ml5j5 - And the follow up for the sheer fucking lulz.
The agility they demonstrate trying to dance around the fact that you can never be sure of the danger posed to you by a home invader is absolutely breathtaking. They've latched onto material loss and held on for dear life!
It's like they really don't consider for a second the moral juxtapositions of someone who's good idea of making money is not to enable themselves to make an honest living or apply for subsidy, or even do something illegitimate but harmless like say selling things without a license - their first thought is to create a very dangerous situation for others.
This isn't someone with moral faculties you can trust, they're not afraid to go to jail, they count on the idea that you'll either be compliant, not there, or subdued, and is now in direct proximity of your wife and children. You can't count on them not to be violent, and that has nothing to do with socio economic status - they are on an entirely seperate moral strata and you have to be prepared to handle the worst.
tl;dr, they have no moral compass and are dangerously unstable to be around.
Sounds like all progressives.
Indeed.
I felt the need to write in their native dialect for prying eye's sake - which is essay format.
No. You provided context. They just won't shut the fuck up.