"If the mistreatment ... is ridiculed by the world..." doesn't square properly. You either mean "celebrated" or you meant to only use one of 'mistreatment' or 'ridicule.' But lazy misconstruction of your argument aside, I must assert for clarity that what people are actually doing is ridiculing the mistreatment conducted of Amber Heard BEFORE this point. The present treatment is being celebrated, and it is being celebrated for its karmic comeuppance relative to the previous undeserved favor and lavish support.
So then, how does the celebration of present justice, and ridicule of past injustice (mistreatment) result in a dangerous outcome for Black women? Do tell.
"If the mistreatment ... is ridiculed by the world..." doesn't square properly. You either mean "celebrated" or you meant to only use one of 'mistreatment' or 'ridicule.' But lazy misconstruction of your argument aside, I must assert for clarity that what people are actually doing is ridiculing the mistreatment conducted of Amber Heard BEFORE this point. The present treatment is being celebrated, and it is being celebrated for its karmic comeuppance relative to the previous undeserved favor and lavish support.
So then, how does the celebration of present justice, and ridicule of past injustice (mistreatment) result in a dangerous outcome for Black women? Do tell.
That means the mistreatment itself was ridiculed, not the person who was mistreated. Writer doesn't know how to write.