You linked to a video where the Rabbi said that mass executing Jews in the Holocaust was a good ides. Of course you are going to get a ban. Also, your ban was 6 days, which was the result of still continuing to violate the rules.
Why be pedantic about it. The message is clear: he's arguing that the jews deserved the holocaust. The fact that he considers genocide to be an earned action, is to argue that it is moral. Aka: good.
so we're literally going to be that old Russian saying meme, only the how is allowed, but not why, not even when it was a rabi explaining the events that preceeded what supposedly happened and warning his fellows similar actions in the present day might have consequences, as he was literally saying he's not saying Hitler should have done it and somewhat cursed his name in the same breath.
so suddenly, for no reason at all, the Germans elected Hitler into the office? either what the rabi said was true or it was not, if it was false then feel free to strike it down, if it was true, why would you think that mere mentioning of those facts would be justifying what supposedly happened as moral and good, instead of as a warning to everyone not to repeat the same mistakes?
I can see it now, in 2150, students asking why a certain population has been genocided yet again within the short two hundred years and the teacher replies they (the society) don't know, because any discussion of the environments and situations leading up to the event would be considers as supporting the event as an earned action and thus morally good. the year 2350, the same question is asked about the third genocide, and still nobody knows why it happened yet again.
No, no. The why is banned specifically. That's what rule 16 enforces. The assertion that entire races and demographics of people are innately morally inferior. What that rabbi did was assert that the jews deserved the holocaust because of their innate behavior which was innately immoral.
so suddenly, for no reason at all, the Germans elected Hitler into the office?
No, you're just ahistorical and ignorant. You don't understand the German unification movements, the militarization of Germany during WW1, Berlin being the center of Socialist and Progressive intellectual movements since the late 1800's, the Russian and Communist revolutionary efforts during the Interwar Period, the failure of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, the Internationalist/Nationalist split after the failure of Marxist predictions during WW1, the global intellectual support of Fascism, and the way Race Communism (National Socialism) requires an out-group as a means to seize power and bring about the Socialist revolution.
Also, no one elected Hitler. There's a much larger discussion around the very specific nature of how Hitler got into power through the machinations of German anti-Communists, militarists, and industrialists; even as a way of trying to preserve the Wiemar Republic... but you don't know a single fucking thing about German history, so there's no point in having a discussion about why you're gonna cry about the jews. We can't even begin to talk about how integrated the jewish population of Germany actually was, because in addition to not knowing anything about germans, you don't know anything about jews. You're a useless mouthpiece for your ideology and nothing more.
, if it was false then feel free to strike it down, if it was true,
It wasn't true, but being false isn't why it's being struck down. I'm striking it down to gatekeep Leftists. That's what a National Socialist is. I don't need you balkanizing the population in to rival ethno-political lines so that you can kill the site with your ideology of weakness and failure, as you did the germans.
You linked to a video where the Rabbi said that mass executing Jews in the Holocaust was a good ides. Of course you are going to get a ban. Also, your ban was 6 days, which was the result of still continuing to violate the rules.
he did not say it was a good idea, quote it where he said that
Why be pedantic about it. The message is clear: he's arguing that the jews deserved the holocaust. The fact that he considers genocide to be an earned action, is to argue that it is moral. Aka: good.
You're not the first person to post it, you know.
so we're literally going to be that old Russian saying meme, only the how is allowed, but not why, not even when it was a rabi explaining the events that preceeded what supposedly happened and warning his fellows similar actions in the present day might have consequences, as he was literally saying he's not saying Hitler should have done it and somewhat cursed his name in the same breath.
so suddenly, for no reason at all, the Germans elected Hitler into the office? either what the rabi said was true or it was not, if it was false then feel free to strike it down, if it was true, why would you think that mere mentioning of those facts would be justifying what supposedly happened as moral and good, instead of as a warning to everyone not to repeat the same mistakes?
I can see it now, in 2150, students asking why a certain population has been genocided yet again within the short two hundred years and the teacher replies they (the society) don't know, because any discussion of the environments and situations leading up to the event would be considers as supporting the event as an earned action and thus morally good. the year 2350, the same question is asked about the third genocide, and still nobody knows why it happened yet again.
No, no. The why is banned specifically. That's what rule 16 enforces. The assertion that entire races and demographics of people are innately morally inferior. What that rabbi did was assert that the jews deserved the holocaust because of their innate behavior which was innately immoral.
No, you're just ahistorical and ignorant. You don't understand the German unification movements, the militarization of Germany during WW1, Berlin being the center of Socialist and Progressive intellectual movements since the late 1800's, the Russian and Communist revolutionary efforts during the Interwar Period, the failure of the Social Democratic Party of Germany, the Internationalist/Nationalist split after the failure of Marxist predictions during WW1, the global intellectual support of Fascism, and the way Race Communism (National Socialism) requires an out-group as a means to seize power and bring about the Socialist revolution.
Also, no one elected Hitler. There's a much larger discussion around the very specific nature of how Hitler got into power through the machinations of German anti-Communists, militarists, and industrialists; even as a way of trying to preserve the Wiemar Republic... but you don't know a single fucking thing about German history, so there's no point in having a discussion about why you're gonna cry about the jews. We can't even begin to talk about how integrated the jewish population of Germany actually was, because in addition to not knowing anything about germans, you don't know anything about jews. You're a useless mouthpiece for your ideology and nothing more.
It wasn't true, but being false isn't why it's being struck down. I'm striking it down to gatekeep Leftists. That's what a National Socialist is. I don't need you balkanizing the population in to rival ethno-political lines so that you can kill the site with your ideology of weakness and failure, as you did the germans.