Arguing with an idiot or arguing with a genuinely smart person who's too stubborn to admit they're wrong and too lazy to look at the facts when they're shoved under their nose?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I'd say arguing with an expert in a field that has nothing to do with the subject. Especially when they don't acknowledge or try to study the new field.
good one!