This is totally organic and natural and not at all related to relentless indoctrination from the media and social pressure to conform.
I wonder what the percentages are of those who are actually L, G, or B, versus those who are claiming a T or Q identity so they can be part of the in-crowd.
I also wonder what the societal hangover is going to be like when those who are high on the T identity come down and realize they've irreversibly fucked up their bodies.
I'm sure the mass indoctrination of kids has something to do with it.
Have you actually taken a minute to actually look at the average zoomer and how dysgenic they look? The last time we had Darwinian selection in European populations was the 17th century. The climate was harsh, food was scarce. Back then 1 in 3 children died in infancy and probably many more died before passing their genes on. Darwinian selection is critical in eradicating bad mutations, in keeping a population genetically similar enough to cooperate and promoting mutations that promote group centric values. The lack of this has produced the horde of spiteful mutants that make up modern society - and to be fair the modern left is an expression of this trend.
Zoomers are the end of the genetic rainbow.
You won't improve the situation unless you find a way to kill off all the weak children so only the strong reproduce. Civilisation is always dysgenic. The same thing happened with Rome. Skeleton sizes in Europe increased after the death of the empire and living standards for the peasants and barbarians actually increased.
If you're of Anglo or northern European ancestry then you're a barbarian by nature. We should probably take a leaf or two out of our ancestors way of doing things and put a stop to the soy faggotry.
Childhood diseases exist for a reason - in fact disease in general have a protective effect on ones homeland. If we still accepted a general rate of infectious disease like measles most 3rd worlders would not be able to colonise our lands as they have no resistance to it. Just like if we go to Africa we have no genetic resistance to Malaria or yellow fever.
If we still accepted a general rate of infectious disease like measles most 3rd worlders would not be able to colonise our lands as they have no resistance to it. Just like if we go to Africa we have no genetic resistance to Malaria or yellow fever.
That's a very deep crimson pill to swallow. Can't say you're wrong, though. If it was genetically difficult to be an invader, invasions wouldn't be as prevalent.
England has only ever been invaded by other Europeans. Had the Aztecs or Bantu tried to invade Europe (assuming they had gained the technological advantage to do so) our diseases would have wiped them all out. Now we wiped out most infectious disease with vaccination and antibiotics it has made it possible for different civilisations to mix freely.
This is totally organic and natural and not at all related to relentless indoctrination from the media and social pressure to conform.
I wonder what the percentages are of those who are actually L, G, or B, versus those who are claiming a T or Q identity so they can be part of the in-crowd.
I also wonder what the societal hangover is going to be like when those who are high on the T identity come down and realize they've irreversibly fucked up their bodies.
I'm sure the mass indoctrination of kids has something to do with it.
Have you actually taken a minute to actually look at the average zoomer and how dysgenic they look? The last time we had Darwinian selection in European populations was the 17th century. The climate was harsh, food was scarce. Back then 1 in 3 children died in infancy and probably many more died before passing their genes on. Darwinian selection is critical in eradicating bad mutations, in keeping a population genetically similar enough to cooperate and promoting mutations that promote group centric values. The lack of this has produced the horde of spiteful mutants that make up modern society - and to be fair the modern left is an expression of this trend.
Zoomers are the end of the genetic rainbow.
You won't improve the situation unless you find a way to kill off all the weak children so only the strong reproduce. Civilisation is always dysgenic. The same thing happened with Rome. Skeleton sizes in Europe increased after the death of the empire and living standards for the peasants and barbarians actually increased.
If you're of Anglo or northern European ancestry then you're a barbarian by nature. We should probably take a leaf or two out of our ancestors way of doing things and put a stop to the soy faggotry.
Childhood diseases exist for a reason - in fact disease in general have a protective effect on ones homeland. If we still accepted a general rate of infectious disease like measles most 3rd worlders would not be able to colonise our lands as they have no resistance to it. Just like if we go to Africa we have no genetic resistance to Malaria or yellow fever.
That's a very deep crimson pill to swallow. Can't say you're wrong, though. If it was genetically difficult to be an invader, invasions wouldn't be as prevalent.
Generally you're invaded by people of like type.
England has only ever been invaded by other Europeans. Had the Aztecs or Bantu tried to invade Europe (assuming they had gained the technological advantage to do so) our diseases would have wiped them all out. Now we wiped out most infectious disease with vaccination and antibiotics it has made it possible for different civilisations to mix freely.