Fair warning the next 3-4 books are the biggest slog, almost enough to kill your interest in the series.
It has one of the most, I'm not sure if intentional, accurate representations of women I've ever read in a book series.
Yes and no. One of my biggest complaints for the series is that every single woman is exactly the same, with perhaps a minor exception for Min and Bridget. It's like every other woman is just based on his nagging wife.
In that sense, it's probably pretty accurate just because he had such a detailed study. But none of the characters are anything at all like any of the women in my family, or some of my friends. My old boss? Absolutely spot on. 95% of all waitresses I've ever worked with? Also pretty accurate. However, they still had a lot more variability and differences than the women in WoT.
The closest to an actual strong (emotionally stable and capable) woman is probably Bridget. But the women spend most of the time trying to get her to act more like them, lol. Again, accurate for how those type of women are. But I'm pretty sure he was just writing Bridget as a man.
The few women I've known who behave pretty much exactly like his wife I mean the characters in the books, were rarely very capable at all. Usually so overloaded with gossip that there was no chance they could actually accomplish something, or playing queen of the universe with someone else's money. If you put a group of those women in charge of something it would fail within the year, not last a few thousand.
My vote for most accurate representation of women would probably go to the Dragon's of Pern series. Since the author was a woman, she portrays a lot of different women pretty accurately, and still managed to create strong capable men, in a meritocracy, who had to deal with conniving women and their schemes and fix their problems. Personality and character interaction isn't nearly as much focus as it is in WoT though. Even the books which focus on female protagonists, their primary adversarial issues always seem to be other conniving women. It's also pretty clear with it's representation of both "strong" (emotionally stable and capable) women, and morally upstanding men, being rare and uncommon.
The closest is Birgitte, but there's another, somewhat unpalatable dimension to that which is only really hinted at.
Some of the female villains, especially the female Forsaken, don't have that attitude towards men specifically, but that's only because they all have that attitude towards literally everyone else, women included.
Fair warning the next 3-4 books are the biggest slog, almost enough to kill your interest in the series.
Yes and no. One of my biggest complaints for the series is that every single woman is exactly the same, with perhaps a minor exception for Min and Bridget. It's like every other woman is just based on his nagging wife.
In that sense, it's probably pretty accurate just because he had such a detailed study. But none of the characters are anything at all like any of the women in my family, or some of my friends. My old boss? Absolutely spot on. 95% of all waitresses I've ever worked with? Also pretty accurate. However, they still had a lot more variability and differences than the women in WoT.
The closest to an actual strong (emotionally stable and capable) woman is probably Bridget. But the women spend most of the time trying to get her to act more like them, lol. Again, accurate for how those type of women are. But I'm pretty sure he was just writing Bridget as a man.
The few women I've known who behave pretty much exactly like
his wifeI mean the characters in the books, were rarely very capable at all. Usually so overloaded with gossip that there was no chance they could actually accomplish something, or playing queen of the universe with someone else's money. If you put a group of those women in charge of something it would fail within the year, not last a few thousand.My vote for most accurate representation of women would probably go to the Dragon's of Pern series. Since the author was a woman, she portrays a lot of different women pretty accurately, and still managed to create strong capable men, in a meritocracy, who had to deal with conniving women and their schemes and fix their problems. Personality and character interaction isn't nearly as much focus as it is in WoT though. Even the books which focus on female protagonists, their primary adversarial issues always seem to be other conniving women. It's also pretty clear with it's representation of both "strong" (emotionally stable and capable) women, and morally upstanding men, being rare and uncommon.
The closest is Birgitte, but there's another, somewhat unpalatable dimension to that which is only really hinted at.
Some of the female villains, especially the female Forsaken, don't have that attitude towards men specifically, but that's only because they all have that attitude towards literally everyone else, women included.