Breaking The Spell: Free PDF
(u1lib.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
This prize: https://italytravelideas.com/1-5-million-euros-for-proof-of-isolation-and-thus-existence-of-coronavirus-still-not-won/
I don’t know what you mean in terms of why you would care about what specifically.
The prize is guaranteed. Think of it this way: if it could be proven, wouldn’t someone try to claim it?
Here is a short lecture on the history of germ theory:
https://youtu.be/pnN4Dh-h9ls
Here is a discussion among 3 doctors discussing the isolation process of a virus:
https://www.brighteon.com/08e2ac4b-461e-4852-b8cf-2c2bded2a1ea
Here is a well sourced and documented book on allopathic medicine and germ theory:
https://book4you.org/book/5418297/958a07 What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong Dawn Lester, David Parker
Believe me - I completely get where you are coming from. I felt the same exact way when people in NNN started to presented these ideas to me, such that it took me about six weeks before I agreed to look into it, mostly because I see how much the control grid is lying about Covid so I wanted to try and figure out what actually was going on. I began by entertaining the idea that Covid itself was not real, and thought it impossible that all germ theory was fake. Yet, here I am, after hundreds of hours of research.
Believe it or not, no virus has ever been shown to exist. We are talking about a thing here, not an idea, or an emotion, or a wave. If the thing exists, show me the thing. We can see many things much smaller than an alleged virus with an electron microscope. Yet, no one can show me a virus.
You can see I am just trying to have a conversation with you about this. Like I said, don’t believe me - research this with an open mind if you are interested in it. The book I linked is fascinating.
Im happy to discuss this or answer any questions if you have a genuine desire to look into it.
No thinking person would trust that they would come up with the money regardless of the evidence presented to them. I've seen this game played before when people ask for evidence, and have it presented to them, then reject the evidence and yell debunked.
Let me be clear about this. I have personally seen bacteria with my own eyes with the aid of a microscope. Many, many, children have. This is not hard to do. Rejecting Germ Theory is a rejection of the evidence of bacteria itself.
You aren't the first person to unfortunately dive head-first into bullshit. There's more than a few people here who have. Hundreds of hours of affirmation bias doesn't help.
I suggest you actually try. You're correct, you can see viruses. Viruses can be presented to you. In fact, you can probably save yourself time and effort by literally getting the equipment necessary to look for them. Same with bacteria.
I never said bacteria don’t exist. Bacteria are the foundation of life imo; trillions exist inside of us, for example as our gut biome. Mitochondria most likely evolved from bacteria.
To make things more confusing, I also don’t think that viruses don’t exist. What I believe appears not to be true is your original assumption of my thinking, which is that germ theory is not true; specifically, that exogenous contagious pathogens do not exist.
If you could take less than five minutes, you could read the first chapter in the document I linked to understand Elder’s Process, the method for “isolating a virus”. Taking fluid from a person you believe has the virus, mixing it with several different animal genetic material, growing it on a monkey kidney, adding antibiotics and toxins to the culture, starving the culture, blending it and freezing it, then looking under a microscope and claiming one of the things you view is the virus - is preposterous. What you see is most likely an exosome released by cells under stress or detoxing (what a virus actually is), or simply an artifact.