It's interesting. He made the point that there are two interests involved, the fetus and the mother. She then replied that you can't limit the rights of a woman, completely ignoring that he just brought up the rights of the fetus as well.
If that's the best argument they have then I look forward to seeing it struck down.
It's interesting. He made the point that there are two interests involved, the fetus and the mother. She then replied that you can't limit the rights of a woman, completely ignoring that he just brought up the rights of the fetus as well.
If that's the best argument they have then I look forward to seeing it struck down.