We all know the narrative. The "left" is soft on Islamic extremists and Islamic terrorism, and this is because they are too afraid of being called "racist". While they is likely some truth to it, it another thought occurred to me - could this be, at least in part, due to the fact that those tactics by the extremists actually worked? Could it be because these people are actually afraid of those extremists and it's their way of appeasing them, in the hope that they'll be spared? If the last two years have thought us anything, it's that complying with tyranny is all the rage among these people.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I think you're giving them too much credit. I don't think they actually have a big master plan. They're just weak people driven by their basic, flawed, impulses.
If you are willing to open your mind start here
The summary is university "intellectuals", who refused to give up on communim despite its demonstrated failures, are creating "activists" whose purpose is to make negros angry until those negros riot. Somehow that brings about communist utopia.
There doesnt need to be a plan. Large and complex structures can be created by many individual agents acting according to simple programming.
I believe the operating idea is that the more you damage civilisation, the more attractive communism becomes as an alternative.
Once again demonstrating that all communists know how to do is to destroy - at least until they follow the traditional path of useful idiots and they're all lined up against a wall by the inevitable dictator demanded by the populace to actually get some food grown.