I didn’t know it had started. When I saw how the media painted him I figured he was on the right side. I think the only thing they could charge him with is being too young to have that gun
Exactly. Charging him with illegal firearm possession makes about as much sense as charging a rape victim with driving without a license after they jump into a car to flee their rapist.
I didn’t know it had started. When I saw how the media painted him I figured he was on the right side. I think the only thing they could charge him with is being too young to have that gun
There is two, maybe even three separate issues there.
Was he to young to possess a weapon? Not under state law.
Even if it was illegal, does that change his self defense claim? Even criminals can defend themselves from unlawful attacks.
They might even try a 2A approach, but rights don't come with a age limit.
Exactly. Charging him with illegal firearm possession makes about as much sense as charging a rape victim with driving without a license after they jump into a car to flee their rapist.
Gotcha. Thanks for explaining that.