is it true that the ways of having names on your windows has been removed? I dont think that will be easier for normies, even the computer literate ones.
It's better to have a functional OS with new features instead of a bloated one weighed down by legacy support.
this is the continuous meme pushed by microshills. W10 isnt bloated because of legacy, its bloated because ms redid everything that worked, put in a totally new system of applications that are inferior to their predecessor (UWP) which has been a bust for near 8 years straight now, and theyre still trying to get people to use it. this aint happpenin, ms. never .
W10 would be really fast if MS would remove ALL THE NEW SHIT that no one wanted in the OS. proof: try the edition without cortana and the new frameworks, its just as fast as W8 and W7 were.
Old code isnt slowing down MS, its their talentless immigrants who MS fired employees for.
the ceo is an untalented pajeet hire too. he told employees to just skip meetings. he fired the QA team. ms is flailing and in the final years of people's use of their operating systems, nadalla just doesnt know it yet.
I'd argue Windows 11 is a fairly small change overall
Moving the start menu and forcing the task bar to be a dock is just as major as W8 getting rid of it altogether. Vista wasnt a big ui change, it was closer to a "theme" pack, that otherwise kept the underlying system the same (control panel, start, and other mainstays of the windows operating system).
Navigating the OS should be intuitive to a Windows 10 user
But most are not skilled w0 users because of its unfriendlyness to noobies.
I imagine most media outlets will lambast the UI, as they do every generation.
Can you share the articles that youd read of media outlets lambasting Windows 7's UI? (Or even Windows 8.1?)
afaik w10 is only supported a few more years.
is it true that the ways of having names on your windows has been removed? I dont think that will be easier for normies, even the computer literate ones.
this is the continuous meme pushed by microshills. W10 isnt bloated because of legacy, its bloated because ms redid everything that worked, put in a totally new system of applications that are inferior to their predecessor (UWP) which has been a bust for near 8 years straight now, and theyre still trying to get people to use it. this aint happpenin, ms. never .
W10 would be really fast if MS would remove ALL THE NEW SHIT that no one wanted in the OS. proof: try the edition without cortana and the new frameworks, its just as fast as W8 and W7 were.
Old code isnt slowing down MS, its their talentless immigrants who MS fired employees for.
the ceo is an untalented pajeet hire too. he told employees to just skip meetings. he fired the QA team. ms is flailing and in the final years of people's use of their operating systems, nadalla just doesnt know it yet.
Moving the start menu and forcing the task bar to be a dock is just as major as W8 getting rid of it altogether. Vista wasnt a big ui change, it was closer to a "theme" pack, that otherwise kept the underlying system the same (control panel, start, and other mainstays of the windows operating system).
But most are not skilled w0 users because of its unfriendlyness to noobies.
Can you share the articles that youd read of media outlets lambasting Windows 7's UI? (Or even Windows 8.1?)