Does anyone find it strange that THIS whistleblower is the one that the federal government and other corporate media is listening to? There's been numerous big tech whistleblowers in the past, but they've all been from right-wing platforms, and even some left-wing ones, but I've noticed the only time this seems to have gained any sort of traction is because it involves young children, and more "importantly", young WOMEN.
So it's that meme narrative - social media is making us crazy, women most affected.
From a "red pill" standpoint, the lady who is doing the whistleblowing is in her late 30's. I can't tell what the fuck she made because all the articles about her just copy-pastas her profile, but apparently she's a software engineer, which is as ambiguous of a term as someone who farts into the wind. She doesn't really talk about being married all that much, mostly seems to be a carrier-oriented "independent wamen".
I'm trying to figure out what's so brave about something everyone knew from just anecdotally looking at evidence. Why is she being considered brave for saying something we all already knew?
There was a real whistelblower, who got deleted. Coincidentally, Facebook was aware of evidence that corroborated whistleblower's intel as fact, and couldn't be gotten rid of without going "Hilary Clinton" on their servers. In turn, they revealed their "I got hacked" trap card and summoned a fugly, fat actress/intern to do damage control.
It's my theory and I'm sticking to it.