Monitoring your Bank Transactions - what the $600 reporting rule really does
(thewriterinblack.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
So essentially, the IRS is going to get what it's always desired, a permanent finger in the wallet of every person who actually earns a living. Fantastic, looking forward to the CRA pulling the same stunt down the road.
The IRS, for years, has known of any time a direct deposit of $1000 is made to y(our) bank account(s). It is checked to see if you paid your taxes on it. And since it's a paycheck, it's linked to your tax id number. The IRS, per-pay-check, already know what you are getting, even it's $442. You pay taxes on that shit son!
What this law does is lower that bracket to include more people in flagging transactions. You know the kind, Billionaires that only work with $600 increments to launder hundreds of millions(/s)
IF only there was some way to not have purchase details show up on a bank statement.
I see what you did there :P
Yes, if we live in the same country, it applies to both of us, this is why I wrote it the way I did.