It will probably trip at least a few of them up. Because if they approve of people being required to show they are considered medically safe to do things needed to live, like grocery shopping, then surely they should agree that doing something that's instead a voluntary act entirely unnecessary for personal survival, yet holds the same type of potential danger (infection of a third party), should also be subject to the same sort of restrictions. I know the dangers of HIV/AIDS has been downplayed in the past few years, but I think the average person will still recognize that AIDS is worse than the wuflu.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Ask them if they know how much the anti-viral drugs required to live "vibrant lives" cost, then show them a list of the one's used in the U.S. and their price tags.
$30 a pill for the cheapest if I recall, and the drugs are getting less and less effective as resistant strains of HIV pop up.
They want you to pay for that though. They want the tax payer to pay for drugs so they keep fucking each other in the ass without a condom.
"So you are okay with people making dangerous decisions that affect their health receiving life-saving treatment? Great, glad we agree. The difference between me and the gay man is, I'm not asking you to pay for my healthcare. I just want to be able to pay to go to the same hospital he gets admitted to at no charge."