Charles Murray describes his 'punishment' for the Bell Curve
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Social sciences began to become corrupted and used as tools for subversion since the '60s and it took off in the mid '80s, without mentioning their current state. Just take a look at Psychological research from any of those periods, one can find many studies and research continuously supporting the progressive agenda and constantly belittling traditional values and behaviors.
There's a famous case that illustrates this really well, search for "Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary" and "Carl Rogers". Regardless, with the benefit of hindsight, it's easy to see how concepts that on the surface looked innocent back then (and since have grown out of control), were used to support the progressive agenda.
Boas corrupted anthropology even earlier. The origins of psychology are blank slatist with freud. But yes,
Carl Rogers - I won't lie, corrupting nuns into sex is kind of my fetish. I kid. But seriously, atomized humanism is a disastrous philosophy. I read this account: https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/story-of-a-repentant-psychologist-11932