I disagree. We're don't make society better by becoming like them in this regard. The focus should be on bettering society not fucking up "the censors."
Sooner we can stop doing this stupid, to me, "left" vs "right" ideology and move on to ...hell, at least more accurate terms that define what we're really believed... the more true progress society will make.
For instance, both "sides" want progress so the term progressive is a misnomer. Esso when they're taking us back into ethnic identity based tribalism.
I could do a while bit on this. How technically "right-wing" means hereditary rule, hierarchy, conformity, etc and very few people who get labeled that ate even ate off its meaning and less that agree with it. How the...boy, almost said "left" its insidious isn't it? How the...well, in this case it might make sense, the "left", as in the more humanist liberals from 50-100 years ago pushed the terms, like they do with most (as they realized that language can be a weapon and labeling your "Alt-Right" opponents as all Nazis and the rest of the 70% of that movement "Alt-Lite" of course turns your opponent, who just win an election, into something that few want to be associated with, etc etc.
But point being: we don't have to encourage censorship, just discourage hypocrisy and only one group being able to express themselves.
Basically, maybe you're right but if both parties are silenced, who does that leave in power? Just the neoliberal Uniparty. And thus the "both sides at once" meme...that I pushed hard leading up to Jan 6th... that went precisely nowhere. Lol
I disagree. We're don't make society better by becoming like them in this regard. The focus should be on bettering society not fucking up "the censors."
Sooner we can stop doing this stupid, to me, "left" vs "right" ideology and move on to ...hell, at least more accurate terms that define what we're really believed... the more true progress society will make.
For instance, both "sides" want progress so the term progressive is a misnomer. Esso when they're taking us back into ethnic identity based tribalism.
I could do a while bit on this. How technically "right-wing" means hereditary rule, hierarchy, conformity, etc and very few people who get labeled that ate even ate off its meaning and less that agree with it. How the...boy, almost said "left" its insidious isn't it? How the...well, in this case it might make sense, the "left", as in the more humanist liberals from 50-100 years ago pushed the terms, like they do with most (as they realized that language can be a weapon and labeling your "Alt-Right" opponents as all Nazis and the rest of the 70% of that movement "Alt-Lite" of course turns your opponent, who just win an election, into something that few want to be associated with, etc etc.
But point being: we don't have to encourage censorship, just discourage hypocrisy and only one group being able to express themselves.
Basically, maybe you're right but if both parties are silenced, who does that leave in power? Just the neoliberal Uniparty. And thus the "both sides at once" meme...that I pushed hard leading up to Jan 6th... that went precisely nowhere. Lol