I kinda wonder what things look like after they've forced electric cars. There's no way we have the power production to support even 25% of cars being electric. I suppose a shortage of power is just another opportunity for them to seize more control.
Exactly. And you notice that ALL leftists are against nuclear power when it's a thousand times more powerful, consistent and almost half the cost of their green energy nonsense. Sure, there's risks of nuclear meltdowns but we've already advanced far enough since Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi.
In general they're against most forms of large-scale power generation. Greenpeace doesn't like to admit this but, given their vociferous opposition, I can only assume that their long-term plan is to return the planet to a late-medieval industrial base, which would only support a population less than 10% of it's current size.
I can only assume that their long-term plan is to return the planet to a late-medieval industrial base, which would only support a population less than 10% of it's current size.
Greenpeace doesn't have a long term plan. Their primary function is to funnel donations into the purchase of their own mansions while sending their useful idiots to spend their holidays on rusting old boats, yelling through megaphones at Japanese whalers who don't understand a word they're saying.
Just like PETA, they exist primarily so that their leadership can pay themselves fat salaries from their donations.
"We went back and forth over whether what these people were doing was a positive thing or a negative thing. Star Trek is such a tech show, and making these people antitechnology, it was almost like doing a negative show on Greenpeace." - Ira Steven Behr
It's super easy to scare their people with too.
I kinda wonder what things look like after they've forced electric cars. There's no way we have the power production to support even 25% of cars being electric. I suppose a shortage of power is just another opportunity for them to seize more control.
Exactly. And you notice that ALL leftists are against nuclear power when it's a thousand times more powerful, consistent and almost half the cost of their green energy nonsense. Sure, there's risks of nuclear meltdowns but we've already advanced far enough since Chernobyl and Fukushima Daiichi.
But communists going to communist, for sure.
In general they're against most forms of large-scale power generation. Greenpeace doesn't like to admit this but, given their vociferous opposition, I can only assume that their long-term plan is to return the planet to a late-medieval industrial base, which would only support a population less than 10% of it's current size.
Greenpeace doesn't have a long term plan. Their primary function is to funnel donations into the purchase of their own mansions while sending their useful idiots to spend their holidays on rusting old boats, yelling through megaphones at Japanese whalers who don't understand a word they're saying.
Just like PETA, they exist primarily so that their leadership can pay themselves fat salaries from their donations.
"We went back and forth over whether what these people were doing was a positive thing or a negative thing. Star Trek is such a tech show, and making these people antitechnology, it was almost like doing a negative show on Greenpeace." - Ira Steven Behr
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Paradise_(episode)