Jokes aside, I'm sure the women cheered at that one.
In 19th century Paraguay, women had not been so utterly divorced from nature, reality, or the consequences of their actions as to believe they could survive without men.
What you rightfully oppose, you wrongfully attribute to an inherent flaw in the female sex rather than their anti-logical reaction to present circumstance.
I am not as down on women as TheImpossible1. (That would be difficult indeed, sometimes I think he's gone full Twink Supremacist.) But nevertheless: they are different.
How should we replace the 19th Amendment? Dunno, offhand. But I think we should.
And jack the voting age up to 21 across all states and local elections, too.
In 19th century Paraguay, women had not been so utterly divorced from nature, reality, or the consequences of their actions as to believe they could survive without men.
What you rightfully oppose, you wrongfully attribute to an inherent flaw in the female sex rather than their anti-logical reaction to present circumstance.
I am not as down on women as TheImpossible1. (That would be difficult indeed, sometimes I think he's gone full Twink Supremacist.) But nevertheless: they are different.
How should we replace the 19th Amendment? Dunno, offhand. But I think we should.
And jack the voting age up to 21 across all states and local elections, too.