For real, how can they compare that one Christian bakery with Twitter and Big Tech.
And on top of that, they use it like some ultimate "gotcha" moment.
The bakery was asked to create something from zero (with their hands, their name and brand).
Twitter was asked to host something (made by others, with other people's names and protected by Section 230).
I personally think it's not that hard to distinguish between the two, but whatever.
BTW, I'm not excusing the politicians that made life super easy for Big Tech and their friends - I still think they were dumb - but now we are experiencing unseen levels of doublethink.
Commies are mentally defective, if they weren't they wouldn't be commies.
Stop trying to make sense of what they say, it will only make you head hurt. They don't care about logic or consistency and only see attempts at dialogue as a weakness they can exploit.
The goal of normal people when they communicate is to convey information. The goal of commies is to 1. signal their personal loyalty to the revolution, 2. identify who is with them and who is against them, 3. publicly forward the goals of the revolution. THATS IT. The CONTENTS of the communication is entirely irrelevant to a commie. In fact, the more nonsensical and illogical it is the better because supporting an illogical position requires MORE "commitment to the cause" than a logical one.
Once you understand the underlying "thought" process then you see that the "bakery argument" makes perfect sense. The sender is showing his loyalty by denouncing patriots, he is doing it in public to attempt to identify allies and enemies based on responses, he is forwarding the goals of the revolution by reinforcing the narrative that censorship against patriots is a good thing.
This is really what I feel when reading some twatter threads, the commies are really uncanny.
There is a reason the NPC meme fits so well.