For real, how can they compare that one Christian bakery with Twitter and Big Tech.
And on top of that, they use it like some ultimate "gotcha" moment.
The bakery was asked to create something from zero (with their hands, their name and brand).
Twitter was asked to host something (made by others, with other people's names and protected by Section 230).
I personally think it's not that hard to distinguish between the two, but whatever.
BTW, I'm not excusing the politicians that made life super easy for Big Tech and their friends - I still think they were dumb - but now we are experiencing unseen levels of doublethink.
The inverse is also true, of course, but they don't want to admit that.
These people think that the company should have been forced to bake that cake but its twitter's right as a private company to ban anyone. Which is it?
Yeah but since the bakery won, for the sake of argument I'll argue this directly