I prefer to rewatch older movies like the Indiana Jones Trilogy (if it was made now Indy would be a cuck no doubt), Star Wars OT, The Godfather, Heat etc. not to mention watch shows like The Sopranos and Stargate SG-1 or play games like GTA IV, The Witcher 2 Mass Effect 2 etc.
All the shit from the past 6+ years or so has been far left propaganda and anti white men. I'm sick of smug bitchy "strong" female characters, lgbt+ degeneracy everywhere and way too many black characters.
They have butchered so many iconic franchises its just depressing
Yes. I watch old TV or film on DVD/BluRay (no streaming) and that's about it. I recently watched all of old Star Trek, which doesn't come off as leftist anymore (actually comes off as right-wing in some messaging) even though it possibly was for its time, showing what's changed.
I still play older competitive games and generally have avoided new ones unless they have no narrative, because the quality of storytelling has decreased along with average IQs since the 90s. The latest game with a narrative that I played was Alyx, because Valve is one of the last independent companies with no CCP influence.
Star Trek has an interesting dynamic.
It is "conservative" in the sense that the main characters have all sworn an oath to defend the Federation, and do so (and we see them do it against enemies both foreign and domestic). And they gatekeep the hell out of their society both in terms of who they interact with and who they admit into the Federation.
It is "liberal" in that Federation society itself is multi-ethnic and somewhat multi-cultural (within their gatekeeping constraints). Though the fact that they gatekeep their culture is itself conservative to modern standards.
It is "leftist" in how it allocates scarce resources (which do exist in-universe: I reject arguments that it is a "post-scarcity" society).
Well said. I also don't believe, contrary to the popular leftist opinion, that the Federation is post-scarcity or even post-currency or post-capitalism, because there's many instances where they seem to not be and both the Federation and its members are engaging in trade and business. My head-canon on this is that they've made common goods on Earth cheap enough to produce that they're essentially free, so no one there "wants" for anything, but they haven't literally done away with all trade. Essentially, a technological rather than a governmental solution to poverty.
Some other things that I see as probably right-wing in it:
An argument can be made that the Prime Directive is gatekeeping and maybe even racist, because it advocates not sharing technology with or helping any society that hasn't reached a certain level of technology already, in most circumstances. There are a few instances where they intervene to stop extinction-type events, but mostly their policy is to stay away and let nature take its course where they can.
Although the Federation is presented as post-racial at least regarding people from Earth, they also openly discriminate in their postings based upon racial differences between different humanoids to some degree. E.g. when Kirk asks to replace Spock with another Vulcan; many crews are mostly from Earth, but there are crews that are mostly or entirely Vulcan, as seen in DS9; Worf likely receives his postings based upon being a Klingon, same with Troi and others, etc. Essentially, the Federation seems to acknowledge that there are different strengths for different people and to choose crew compositions accordingly, rather than treating all as being literally equal in all ways or doing some kind of affirmative action.