This is why this kind of stuff doesn't need a 'huge conspiracy'. Individuals will towards a shared goal without interaction.
Alex Hirsch isn't a DNC operative sent to help cover up election fraud, yet here he is doing exactly that - and that is what he is doing REGARDLESS of whether any actual fraud took place or not. What other reason is there to disrupt the function of this fraud line other than to try and prevent the reporting of fraud?
So here we are, Alex Hirsh, acting completely alone, believing he is assisting in an act of treason.
And bragging about it.
If Trump invokes the insurrection act I am honestly going to masturbate.
This is why this kind of stuff doesn't need a 'huge conspiracy'. Individuals will towards a shared goal without interaction.
This is exactly what I was trying to explain to some people the other day.
There doesn't have to be any big conspiracy to cheat among the democrats for it to have happened.
The democrats and media have created an environment where cheating is easy, and in some people's minds "justified" (to stop literally Hitler). And the elections officials/ballot counters in the deep blue cities in swing states are all ardent democrats.
So if the counters are all democrats, their supervisors are democrats, they're motivated to cheat, and the system has been set up to make cheating extremely easy to do and get away with ... what do you think is going to happen?
Nobody had to make an overarching plan or give the order.
If every other counter was biased just a little bit (disqualify trump ballots, approve rule breaking democrat ballots), and their supervisor turned a neglectful or blind eye, that alone could swing an election. And that's not even getting into the number of counters who are willing to outright cheat.
It's bottom up election fraud. No conspiracy needed.
Bonus benefit:
If a couple ballot counters do get caught it's easy to swing that as an "isolated incident" that couldn't swing the election.
Nobody told them to cheat after all.
This is why this kind of stuff doesn't need a 'huge conspiracy'. Individuals will towards a shared goal without interaction.
Alex Hirsch isn't a DNC operative sent to help cover up election fraud, yet here he is doing exactly that - and that is what he is doing REGARDLESS of whether any actual fraud took place or not. What other reason is there to disrupt the function of this fraud line other than to try and prevent the reporting of fraud?
So here we are, Alex Hirsh, acting completely alone, believing he is assisting in an act of treason.
And bragging about it.
If Trump invokes the insurrection act I am honestly going to masturbate.
This is exactly what I was trying to explain to some people the other day.
There doesn't have to be any big conspiracy to cheat among the democrats for it to have happened.
The democrats and media have created an environment where cheating is easy, and in some people's minds "justified" (to stop literally Hitler). And the elections officials/ballot counters in the deep blue cities in swing states are all ardent democrats.
So if the counters are all democrats, their supervisors are democrats, they're motivated to cheat, and the system has been set up to make cheating extremely easy to do and get away with ... what do you think is going to happen?
Nobody had to make an overarching plan or give the order.
If every other counter was biased just a little bit (disqualify trump ballots, approve rule breaking democrat ballots), and their supervisor turned a neglectful or blind eye, that alone could swing an election. And that's not even getting into the number of counters who are willing to outright cheat.
It's bottom up election fraud. No conspiracy needed.
Bonus benefit:
If a couple ballot counters do get caught it's easy to swing that as an "isolated incident" that couldn't swing the election.
Nobody told them to cheat after all.