Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The tax would be paid for by employers and the income generated would be paid to people who cannot work from home.

This is another transference of wealth just like the ACA. That alone makes it a bad idea. The job you work, the skills you teach yourself, are all personal decisions so if you're working from home or not is the end result of your life's decisions. The government is not here to compensate for your decisions.

The other issue here is that they're mistakenly believing people who go to work are paying into the system. As an example I ride a bicycle to work and eat lunch at home. It's very rare for me to not eat at home even after work. In this scenario I would be one of the employees who gets the benefits from being at work but I don't pay into the system the way they pretend workers do. That's not even mentioning the fact that people choose to live different distances from work. So the closer you are the more beneficial it would be for you. But again, all of this is a matter of personal choice and the government shouldn't be taxing your choices on what skills you choose to learn and where you choose to live in relation to where you work.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The tax would be paid for by employers and the income generated would be paid to people who cannot work from home.

This is another transference of wealth just like the ACA. That alone makes it a bad idea. The job you work, the skills you teach yourself, are all personal decisions so if you're working from home or not is the end result of your lifes decisions. The government is not here to compensate for your decisions.

The other issue here is that they're mistakenly believing people who go to work are paying into the system. As an example I ride a bicycle to work and eat lunch at home. It's very rare for me to not eat at home with family even after work. In this scenario I would be one of the employees who gets the benefits from being at work but I don't pay into the system the way they pretend workers do. There's going to be too much of this to make it effective despite it just being a transference of wealth.

3 years ago
1 score