First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)
Then you have them busybodying their way into how individual couples want to run their lives.
Oh, and Househusbands were always FROWNED UPON, and seen as MOOCHING OFF THEIR OL' LADIES. Oh, but find an old school man who wants to give you an earful about shiftless guys who wanna do that ...... and for that matter, the original Hound Dog by Big Mama Thornton had NOTHING to do with dogs and rabbits, it was about a lazy, shiftless bastard mooching off his woman. Because of COURSE he can't be making himself useful by cooking, cleaning, and running errands becauth hurr durr he's a man, durr.
The Left has simply made a business of TRASHING everything, without really wanting to "repair" anything, they're just all about change for the sake of change for to cause chaos. Also, they're too stupid to understand the difference between "legally equal" and "actually equal in terms of biology or physicality or intelligence or whatever". Yeah, there's a fucking difference. A retard might be equal to a normal human and better than a non-human under the law because it's just easier to treat an entire species that way, but it's certainly not the intellectually "better than" or superior to a higher-IQ non-human just because of its species membership, especially if its the sort that goes around pushing kids off balconies or in front of cars.
First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)
Then you have them busybodying their way into how individual couples want to run their lives.
Oh, and Househusbands were always FROWNED UPON, and seen as MOOCHING OFF THEIR OL' LADIES. Oh, but find an old school man who wants to give you an earful about shiftless guys who wanna do that ...... and for that matter, the original Hound Dog by Big Mama Thornton had NOTHING to do with dogs and rabbits, it was about a lazy, shiftless bastard mooching off his woman. Because of COURSE he can't be making himself useful by cooking, cleaning, and running errands becauth hurr durr he's a man, durr.
The Left has simply made a business of TRASHING everything, without really wanting to "repair" anything, they're just all about change for the sake of change for to cause chaos. Also, they're too stupid to understand the difference between "legally equal" and "actually equal in terms of biology or physicality or intelligence or whatever". Yeah, there's a fucking difference. A retard might be equal to a normal human and better than a non-human under the law because it's just easier to treat an entire species that way, but he's certainly not the intellectually "better than" or superior to a higher-IQ non-human just because of its species membership.
First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)
Then you have them busybodying their way into how individual couples want to run their lives.
Oh, and Househusbands were always FROWNED UPON, and seen as MOOCHING OFF THEIR OL' LADIES. Oh, but find an old school man who wants to give you an earful about shiftless guys who wanna do that ...... and for that matter, the original Hound Dog by Big Mama Thornton had NOTHING to do with dogs and rabbits, it was about a lazy, shiftless bastard mooching off his woman. Because of COURSE he can't be making himself useful by cooking, cleaning, and running errands becauth hurr durr he's a man, durr.
The Left has simply made a business of TRASHING everything, without really wanting to "repair" anything, they're just all about change for the sake of change for to cause chaos.
First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)
Then you have them busybodying their way into how individual couples want to run their lives.
Oh, and Househusbands were always FROWNED UPON, and seen as MOOCHING OFF THEIR OL' LADIES. Oh, but find an old school man who wants to give you an earful about shiftless guys who wanna do that ...... and for that matter, the original Hound Dog by Big Mama Thornton had NOTHING to do with dogs and rabbits, it was about a lazy, shiftless bastard mooching off his woman. Because of COURSE he can't be making himself useful by cooking, cleaning, and running errands becauth hurr durr he's a man, durr.
First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)
Then you have them busybodying their way into how individual couples want to run their lives.
Oh, and Househusbands were always FROWNED UPON, and seen as MOOCHING OFF THEIR OL' LADIES. Oh, but find an old school man who wants to give you an earful about shiftless guys who wanna do that ...... and for that matter, the original Hound Dog by Big Mama Thornton had NOTHING to do with dogs and rabbits, it was about a lazy, shiftless bastard mooching off his woman. Because of COURSE he can't be making himself useful by cooking, cleaning, and running errands.
First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)
Then you have them busybodying their way into how individual couples want to run their lives.
Oh, and Househusbands were always FROWNED UPON, and seen as MOOCHING OFF THEIR OL' LADIES. Oh, but find an old school man who wants to give you an earful about shiftless guys who wanna do that ...... and for that matter, the original Hound Dog by Big Mama Thornton had NOTHING to do with dogs and rabbits, it was about a lazy, shiftless bastard mooching off his woman.
First of all, drop that "gender" crap, that's drinking their kool-aid right there. Gender is a term from linguistics, and has nothing to do with sex. Masculine/feminine =/= male and female. Completely separate things (even if the former is based on the latter), as one can be masculine without being male, or feminine without being female (or even fucking alive.)
We used to say "Battle of the Sexes", not "Battle of the Genders". Jesus Christ, there was even a fucking TV game show called that for a while.
And yeah, of course there are differences. The two sexes are "meant" (as far as anything is "meant" to be) to complement one another. It's kind why things seem to work better if you have a partner to help.
The problem with the Left is that 1) they conflate other cultures with the West - the way they describe the past is really fucking distorted, and often sounds more like they're describing modern Muslim or recent pre-modern Chinese bullshit when it comes to how women were treated/property rights and shit (this is a result of their "all cultures ar ethe same" lying nonsense; and 2) Describe even the modern day as something like from a distorted version of the 1950s.
And as far as aggression goes, I recommend Konrad Lorenz's "On Aggression" and maybe a peek at Kipling's opinion of female aggression (ie, if we were kept out of men's counsels, it's because we're more likely to want to start a war over any perceived threat to us and our own than the menfolk. But that would be a function of not having to fight the war ourselves. Yeah, I think "equality" should include the draft. Maybe sometimes the female of the pair IS the one who should go. And keep in mind "aggression" doesn't just mean "naked hostility", it simply refers to being bold enough to get what you want. The bird who refuses to give way as you pass is being just as aggressive as a salesman with his foot in your door.)