MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but it will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like an MTG quality portfolio at all and she isn't even in the ballpark of the genre, yet she got hired.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like an MTG quality portfolio at all and she isn't even in the ballpark of the genre, yet she got hired.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like an MTG quality portfolio at all, she isn't even in the ballpark of the genre, yet she got hired.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like a WotC quality portfolio at all, she isn't even in the ballpark of the genre, yet she got hired.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like a WotC quality portfolio at all, not even in the ballpark of the genre, yet she got hired.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like a WotC quality portfolio at all, not even in the ballpark of the genre.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like a WotC quality portfolio at all.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage. This doesn't look like a WotC portfolio at all.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism. Not at this point.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality, it's a hackjob pretending to be vintage.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly. Look at all the jumps in quality.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. Suspended maybe - they'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism.

https://www.faydalton.com/ looking at her work, it really does stand out to me that she is a reference-fag (aphantasiac) who can't into perspective or faces unless copied directly.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've seen this shit get so out of hand in the art community that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. They'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

This person probably won't even get fired. They'll fire you for liking the wrong people on twitter, but no, not actual plagiarism.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to artwork and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to art, and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK IF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to art, and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORKIF IT IS REFERENCE". Smol brain takes all around.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to art, and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along. It's been getting worse.

Over the years I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK". Smol brain takes all around.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to art, and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE". This is of course a big no-no, but this will only increase as less skilled hires tag along.

Over the years I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK". Smol brain takes all around.

MTG tends to only care about the end result whenever it comes to art, and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE".

I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK". Smol brain takes all around.

MTG tends to only care about the end result, and there are artists that will absolutely plagiarize the work of another artist - where in their mind it's justified because "HEY, I COPIED THAT FROM SCRATCH AND USED DIFFERENT LIGHTING SO IT'S JUST REFERENCE".

I've this shit get so out of hand that it'll look like someone slapped a filter over another person's work and other artists would come rushing to their defense with the same list of excuses. "LOOK AT THESE COMIC BOOK ARTISTS WHO FOLLOW STOCK REFERENCES CLOSELY, SEE? IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK". Smol brain takes all around.