Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It's not just because it's in another country. This would be bigger news if those in power didn't block the story from spreading. They own the press. That may not mean much manipulation in local news but stories they don't want spreading get blocked from going international.

I'm sure the NYT upper management has received their orders from their international paymasters

Funny aside. I recently saw The Omen 2 (son of Satan goes to boarding school, not good flick). and the cult that protects and enables the antichrist have formulated how he will begin to seize world power. How?

By monopolizing food production, putting it in control of Damien's corporations he will inherit.

From the movie---

Paul: One person dies of starvation every 8.6 seconds. Seven every minute. 420 every hour. 10,000 every day! To feed these people, we have to farm the ocean. We have to develop new strains of high-yield, disease-resistant grain crops. The oil countries didn't hesitate to squeeze our jugular vein. So, what's so different about food? If you've got a knife at your belly, you'll keep still. Why, then, call my policy unethical?

Bill: It's callous and inhuman... and in my opinion, illegal.

Paul: What is inhuman about feeding people?

Pasarian: Bill's point is, if we control the food people eat, it's tantamount to making slaves of them.

Paul: Ah, customers!

Bill: But you want us to buy up their land.

Paul: Thorn's have the hardware and knowledge that's easily adaptable to the purpose of large-scale farming. This, with the pesticides and fertilisers we produce gives us the jump on any Government or corporate entity in the world.

Bill: If we control their land, we make them tenants.

Paul: We make their bellies full. But I still don't understand your opposition. Just because it's never been done doesn't make it illegal.

Bill: But is it ethical?

112 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It's not just because it's in another country. This would be bigger news if those in power didn't block the story from spreading. They own the press. That may not mean much manipulation in local news but stories they don't want it spreading so it gets blocked from going international.

I'm sure the NYT upper management has received their orders from their international paymasters

Funny aside. I recently saw The Omen 2 (son of Satan goes to boarding school, not good flick). and the cult that protects and enables the antichrist have formulated how he will begin to seize world power. How?

By monopolizing food production, putting it in control of Damien's corporations he will inherit.

From the movie---

Paul: One person dies of starvation every 8.6 seconds. Seven every minute. 420 every hour. 10,000 every day! To feed these people, we have to farm the ocean. We have to develop new strains of high-yield, disease-resistant grain crops. The oil countries didn't hesitate to squeeze our jugular vein. So, what's so different about food? If you've got a knife at your belly, you'll keep still. Why, then, call my policy unethical?

Bill: It's callous and inhuman... and in my opinion, illegal.

Paul: What is inhuman about feeding people?

Pasarian: Bill's point is, if we control the food people eat, it's tantamount to making slaves of them.

Paul: Ah, customers!

Bill: But you want us to buy up their land.

Paul: Thorn's have the hardware and knowledge that's easily adaptable to the purpose of large-scale farming. This, with the pesticides and fertilisers we produce gives us the jump on any Government or corporate entity in the world.

Bill: If we control their land, we make them tenants.

Paul: We make their bellies full. But I still don't understand your opposition. Just because it's never been done doesn't make it illegal.

Bill: But is it ethical?

112 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

It's not just because it's in another country. This would be bigger news if those in power didn't block the story from spreading. They own the press. That may not mean much manipulation in local news but stories they don't want it spreading so it gets blocked from going international.

I'm sure the NYT upper management has received their orders from their international paymasters

112 days ago
1 score