So child porn isn't free speech because they can't legally sign contracts. This is where your logic comes from? Do children not have 1st amendment rights?

You're basically a libertarian, aka someone who hides behind laws and semantics in order to avoid taking a stand on immoral and harmful behavior. If porn is free speech, then me broadcasting someone eating shit is free speech too right? They consented since I paid them. How about chopping their nuts off on camera?

Porn is evil and you've had your mind warped by a bunch of jews in the industry into protecting them and their business.

So child porn isn't free speech because they can't legally sign contracts. This is where your logic comes from? Do children not have 1st amendment rights?