Nuclear puts out the same amount of gas emission over it's life cycle while also scaling a lot better.
And since I know exactly what you're about to say (since losers are predictable): nuclear waste is already a solved issue; Chernobyl was multiple, deliberate actions involving a design that never considered failure, Three Mile Island resulted in no deaths; and the tsunami that took out Fukushima killed more people than the reactor ever did (at about 19k dead or missing) and they warned multiple times that the exact thing that ended up happening could happened.
Not only that, but Canada and the United States sit on roughly one million tons of uranium. Nearly 1/8th of known reserves. Combine that with the ability to recycle your uranium as a whopping 95% is reclaimable (a program that Jimmy "History's Greatest Monster" Carter ended within the USA and one that France makes great use of), you have power for millennia without having to rely on foreign nations. You know, despite that being what our leaders want.
Nuclear energy is not only economical and environmental, it's ethical.
Nuclear puts out the same amount of gas emission over it's life cycle while also scaling a lot better.
And since I know exactly what you're about to say (since losers are predictable): nuclear waste is already a solved issue; Chernobyl was multiple, deliberate actions involving a design that never considered failure, Three Mile Island resulted in no deaths; and the tsunami that took out Fukushima killed more people than the reactor ever did (at about 19k dead or missing) and they warned multiple times that the exact thing that ended up happening could happened.
Not only that, but Canada and the United States sit on roughly one million tons of uranium. Nearly 1/8th of known reserves. Combine that with the ability to recycle your uranium as a whopping 95% is reclaimable (a program that Jimmy "History's Greatest Monster" Carter ended within the USA and one that France ), you have power for millennia without having to rely on foreign nations. You know, despite that being what our leaders want.
Nuclear energy is not only economical and environmental, it's ethical.
Nuclear puts out the same amount of gas emission over it's life cycle while also scaling a lot better.
And since I know exactly what you're about to say (since losers are predictable): nuclear waste is already a solved issue; Chernobyl was multiple, deliberate actions involving a design that never considered failure, Three Mile Island resulted in no deaths; and the tsunami that took out Fukushima killed more people than the reactor ever did (at about 19k dead or missing) and they warned multiple times that the exact thing that ended up happening could happened.
Not only that, but Canada and the United States sit on roughly one million tons of uranium. Nearly 1/8th of known reserves. Imagine not having to rely on other nations for your energy needs. Nuclear energy is not only economical and environmental, it's ethical.
Nuclear puts out the same amount of gas emission over it's life cycle while also scaling a lot better.
And since I know exactly what you're about to say (since losers are predictable): nuclear waste is already a solved issue; Chernobyl was multiple, deliberate actions involving a design that never considered failure, Three Mile Island resulted in no deaths, and the tidal wave that took out Fukushima killed more people than the reactor ever did (at about 19k dead or missing).