Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Thanks to data peering agreements, Youtube doesn't actually cost Google a whole lot to run. Thanks to 90% automation for disputes they don't have to hire as many people as you might think, and most of those are the literal cheapest and stupidest on the planet who just follow scripts anyway. Those plaques cost like maybe $10 per. Data storage? Ridiculously cheap these days.

They make a killing from pedowood paying them to promote their digital bullshit in suggestions, from raking 30% off the top in superchats and memberships, selling premium plans after removing useful features and locking them away behind a paywall and, yes, conventional old advertising. They've been profitable for quite a few years. $30 Billion in 2021 was the last number I remember.

This is just a case of "there's money on the table and we're just going to take it because our users will fully accept any ass-ramming we want to do." Same reason Google reneged on their free Workspaces. Same reason they threaten to delete inactive accounts (keeping them around costs nothing, it's the threats that seek to encourage more usage to data mine and use for AI training).

It's the competitors which can't afford to get off the ground. No peering (no one is going to say no to Google and risk the ire of their customers, but they'll say no to Random Nazi-filled Competitor, as least how leftists see them). No scale for automation. No hollywood money. No sportsball money. No one will open their wallets on weird sites. And no conventional advertising on, again, Random Nazi-filled Competitor.

332 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Thanks to data peering agreements, Youtube doesn't actually cost Google a whole lot to run. Thanks to 90% automation for disputes they don't have to hire as many people as you might think, and most of those are the literal cheapest and stupidest on the planet who just follow scripts anyway. Those plaques cost like maybe $10 per. Data storage? Ridiculously cheap these days.

They make a killing from pedowood paying them to promote their digital bullshit in suggestions, from raking 30% off the top in superchats and memberships, selling premium plans after removing useful features and locking them away behind a paywall and, yes, conventional old advertising. They've been profitable for quite a few years. $30 Billion in 2021 was the last number I remember.

This is just a case of "there's money on the table and we're just going to take it because our users will fully accept any ass-ramming we want to do."

It's the competitors which can't afford to get off the ground. No peering (no one is going to say no to Google and risk the ire of their customers, but they'll say no to Random Nazi-filled Competitor, as least how leftists see them). No scale for automation. No hollywood money. No sportsball money. No one will open their wallets on weird sites. And no conventional advertising on, again, Random Nazi-filled Competitor.

332 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Thanks to data peering agreement, Youtube doesn't actually cost Google a whole lot to run. Thanks to 90% automation for disputes they don't have to hire as many people as you might think, and most of those are the literal cheapest and stupidest on the planet who just follow scripts anyway. Those plaques cost like maybe $10 per. Data storage? Ridiculously cheap these days.

They make a killing from pedowood paying them to promote their digital bullshit in suggestions, from raking 30% off the top in superchats and memberships, selling premium plans after removing useful features and locking them away behind a paywall and, yes, conventional old advertising. They've been profitable for quite a few years. $30 Billion in 2021 was the last number I remember.

This is just a case of "there's money on the table and we're just going to take it because our users will fully accept any ass-ramming we want to do."

It's the competitors which can't afford to get off the ground. No peering (no one is going to say no to Google and risk the ire of their customers, but they'll say no to Random Nazi-filled Competitor, as least how leftists see them). No scale for automation. No hollywood money. No sportsball money. No one will open their wallets on weird sites. And no conventional advertising on, again, Random Nazi-filled Competitor.

332 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Thanks to data peering agreement, Youtube doesn't actually cost Google a whole lot to run. Thanks to 90% automation for disputes they don't have to hire as many people as you might think, and most of those are the literal cheapest and stupidest on the planet who just follow scripts anyway. Those plaques cost like maybe $10 per. Data storage? Ridiculously cheap these days.

They make a killing from pedowood paying them to promote their digital bullshit in suggestions, from raking 30% off the top in superchats and memberships, selling premium plans after removing useful features and locking them away behind a paywall and, yes, conventional old advertising. They've been profitable for quite a few years. $30 Billion in 2021 was the last number I remember.

This is just a case of "there's money on the table and we're just going to take it because our users will fully accept and ass-ramming we want to do."

332 days ago
1 score