Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: grammerz

Wedges move the weak-willed / conflicted center, not your left friends. I've never seen a wedge like this.

Wedges are always say 70% left-leaning vs 30% right-leaning so as one side is taking votes from the other they are also losing some on their own side. But a wedge that's 100% right-leaning vs 50% left-leaning? It's unheard of.

It means there's no downside to saying "there are two genders". The more you say it, the more democrats will lose voters.

Of course this fighting over the swayable middle is the secret sauce of the 2-party system because most people are unreasonable. Even people here, recently saying skipping S01 of ST:TNG is a "slippery slope" to woke - like really? It's terrible. People being unreasonable is why winner-take-all USA/UK are still going after hundreds of years, no parliamentary system is even close with average less than a lifetime.

330 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Wedges move the weak-willed / conflicted center, not your left friends. I've never seen a wedge like this.

Wedges are always say 70% left-leaning vs 30% right-leaning so as one side is taking votes from the other they are also losing some on their own side. But a wedge that's 100% right-leaning vs 50% left-leaning? It's unheard of.

It means there's no downside to saying "there are two genders". The more you say it, the more democrats will lose voters.

Of course this fighting over the swayable middle is the secret sauce of the 2-party system because most people are unreasonable. Even people here, recently saying skipping S01 of ST:TNG is a "slippery slope" to woke - like really? It's terrible. Unreasonable people is why winner-take-all USA/UK are still going after hundreds of years, no parliamentary systems is even close with average less than a lifetime.

330 days ago
1 score