Yes, unequivocally.

Consider the White Genocide in Hati, or the Uyghr Genocide in China, or the Assyrian Empire's efforts at displacing and integrating the early Abrahamics (possibly Jews or proto-Jews). Or the Islamic Caliphates' efforts of exterminating ethnic groups by slavery and castration.

Castration, sterilization, eugenics, forced marriages, etc., all of these are what I would call "Breeding Control". You could call it Population Control, but that's too abstract. This is forced breeding or forced non-breeding as a political mechanism of suppression. It is usually tied with genocidal intent to eradicate both the cultural identity, and actual ethnic group of the targeted population.

There has never been a "Rebellion of the Eunuchs", there never will be, and there will never be a civilization of them either. On a societal level, Breeding Control is a social death sentence.

Gee, I wonder why the Queer Revolutionaries the follow Rousseau's logic of Civilization being oppression would want mass Breeding Control...

Yes, unequivocally.

Consider the White Genocide in Hati, or the Uyghr Genocide in China. Or the Assyrian Empire's efforts at exterminating ethnic groups by displacing and integrating them. Or the Islamic Caliphates efforts of exterminating ethnic groups by slavery and castration.

Castration, sterilization, eugenics, forced marriages, etc., all of these are what I would call "Breeding Control". You could call it Population Control, but that's too abstract. This is forced breeding or forced non-breeding as a political mechanism of suppression. It is usually tied with genocidal intent to eradicate both the cultural identity, and actual ethnic group of the targeted population.

There has never been a "Rebellion of the Eunuchs", there never will be, and there will never be a civilization of them either. On a societal level, breeding control is a social death sentence.